Via Slashdot, the NY Times reports on an online community that hunted down a car thief. (NYT requires registration.) Stealing a car is a pretty stupid thing to do (not to mention pretty illegal), and there should be some serious consequences for it. But look at the last line of the article (quoted in the Slashdot summary):
“This guy has worldwide recognition for being a car thief for the rest of his life,” Mr. Ironside said. “The Internet is not going away.”
This is way, way more punishment than a stupid teenager deserves. The quote neatly captures the geographical and temporal scope of internet fame and infamy: world-wide, and forever. GW Law Prof. Daniel Solove has a book called The Future of Reputation (available free online) that talks about the effect of technology on social interaction. I’m guessing he’ll have something to say about this article over at Concurring Opinions pretty soon. I have yet to read his book, so I can’t tie this story directly in with what he writes. But I do have a few thoughts of my own.
In undergrad, a friend of mine did a stupid (and illegal) thing that justifiably pissed off a lot of our mutual friends. There was no legal action, but “justice” was meted out swiftly and harshly through social means. He apologized, but his reputation never really recovered. Talking about it years later, he said that it basically ended him at that college.
So, he transfered. He left that social circle, left his reputation, and got another start. Now, he’s doing very well for himself. He learned his lesson, and he was able to benefit from it because he had a way to start over without that stigma.
That’s the problem with the internet. There is no getting away from it, either by going far away, or by waiting it out. In order to learn from your mistakes, they need to be forgiven or forgotten. But like Mr. Ironside says in the article, the internet doesn’t go away.
So, my initial thoughts are that to account for the infinite duration of any mistakes that manage to make it to the internet, we need to rethink the way we deal with other people socially. People change, but their public record no longer does — it’s all out there, and it’s all very searchable. We need to take this into account when we assess people. Of course, how can you really tell if they have changed? Instinct would tell us that having someone’s life at our fingertips would make it easier to make judgments about them, but if you want to be fair to them, it’s still just as hard as it ever was.
I’ll write more about this after I see what Prof. Solove has to say in his book. Hopefully I’ll also get to take a class with him while I’m at GW. And hopefully, Jamie Jacobson can find some people who are willing to forgive the stupid theft that will follow him the rest of his life.